Using reverse contingent fees for clients caught in the mortgage mess

by Eric Cooperstein on October 14, 2008

One difficulty in representing clients who are “under water” on their mortgages is how the lawyer should get paid for his or her time negotiating a better deal for the client.

The client is heavily in debt, but if the lawyer shines, the client could save tens of thousands of dollars. In a listserve post this week, Professor Andrew Perlman asked: What if the lawyer was paid by taking a percentage of the money that the client saved through renegotiating the mortgage?

Read this article over at >

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: